麻豆社国产

Skip to content

Meghan wins remainder of copyright claim against UK tabloid

LONDON 鈥 Meghan, the Duchess of Sussex, on Wednesday won her remaining copyright claim against a British tabloid publisher over the publication of a personal letter she wrote to her estranged father.
lbj101-37_2020_192933

LONDON 鈥 Meghan, the Duchess of Sussex, on Wednesday won her remaining copyright claim against a British tabloid publisher over the publication of a personal letter she wrote to her estranged father.

Meghan, 39, had already won most of her claim for misuse of private information and copyright infringement against Associated Newspapers Limited, the publisher of the Mail on Sunday and the MailOnline website. The American former actress sued over five 2019 articles that published large portions of a letter she wrote to her father after her 2018 wedding to Prince Harry.

In February, a High Court judge ruled in her favour, saying the publishing of large parts of the handwritten letter was 鈥渕anifestly excessive鈥 and unlawful. The judge granted the duchess鈥檚 request for a summary judgment to settle the case, meaning she won that part of the case without having to go to trial.

But the court still had to decide whether Meghan was the 鈥渟ole author鈥 and copyright holder of the letter.

On Wednesday, the judge sided with Meghan鈥檚 lawyers regarding the remaining parts of their copyright claim, after lawyers representing Queen Elizabeth II refuted the defence鈥檚 claims that the letter鈥檚 copyright belonged to the Crown.

Associated Newspapers Ltd. previously said it believed that Jason Knauf, the former communications secretary to Prince Harry and Meghan, was a co-author of the letter, and argued that this meant the letter belonged to the Crown.

Meghan鈥檚 lawyer Ian Mill told the court that Knauf鈥檚 lawyers confirmed he did not write the letter, and said that the defence鈥檚 case on the ownership of copyright in the letter 鈥渉as been shown to be completely baseless.鈥

In his ruling in February, judge Mark Warby said the public disclosure of Meghan's 鈥減ersonal and private letter" to her father Thomas Markle was unlawful.

鈥淭he majority of what was published was about the claimant鈥檚 own behaviour, her feelings of anguish about her father鈥檚 behaviour, as she saw it, and the resulting rift between them," he said. 鈥淭hese are inherently private and personal matters.鈥

Meghan and Harry officially stepped down from royal duties in March 2020 and moved to California with their young son Archie. The couple has said that relentless scrutiny from the British media was one of the reasons they decided to leave the U.K.

Sylvia Hui, The Associated Press

push icon
Be the first to read breaking stories. Enable push notifications on your device. Disable anytime.
No thanks