Wildfires are a major source of air pollution. They are also as climate change progresses.
Within the smoke particles produced by these fires is a wide range of organic chemical compounds known as “.” Brown carbon absorbs sunlight, and in doing so, .
Over time, the brown carbon is in the atmosphere (such as ozone) and becomes white. This means that it stops absorbing light and stops warming Earth.
This bleaching process is heavily dependent on atmospheric conditions, which vary across regions. The longer it takes for brown carbon to become white, the greater an impact it can have on the environment.
As living in a region , we wanted to know more about these effects. We worked together with atmospheric chemists at the and , along with atmospheric modellers at the , to .
Aerosols and climate
Aerosols are microscopic liquid and solid particles suspended in the atmosphere. They’re smaller than the width of a human hair, but are still made up of many molecules.
Aerosol particles are everywhere and have a large effect and . When aerosol particles interact with light, a portion of the light is absorbed but the rest reflects and scatters off of the particles.
For most types of aerosol particles, the amount being absorbed is negligible. That means . Through this mechanism, some of the pollution we create .
Some aerosol particles, however, are coloured, which means . Any light from the sun that is absorbed instead of getting reflected back into space is converted into heat and warms the planet.
Aerosol particles from smoke contain brown carbon. The various molecules that make up brown carbon are similar to some organic dyes, overall giving it a characteristic brown colour. However, when ozone in the atmosphere reacts with brown carbon, it can transform it into new colourless molecules that do not warm the earth.
Significantly slower reaction
It was previously assumed that reactions between brown carbon and ozone were relatively fast. Within one day of being emitted from a fire, brown carbon would mostly stop absorbing solar radiation. But now, through a combination of laboratory experiments and atmospheric simulations, it is clear that the reaction between brown carbon and ozone can be significantly slower.
Experiments on pine wood smoke showed that . Conversely, when the temperature and humidity were decreased, the brown carbon remained.
This is because temperature and humidity change the viscosity of aerosol particles. Humid conditions lead to a lot of water getting absorbed into the particles, and as a result they become very fluid. But if that water is removed and the aerosols get cold, they become very viscous, like molasses — .
For an oxidant like ozone to bleach brown carbon, ozone needs to penetrate and mix within the smoke particles. When smoke particles become viscous, the oxidants take an extremely long time to mix — over a year in some cases.
At altitudes less than 1 km in the atmosphere, conditions are relatively warm and humid so smoke particles are often not very viscous and brown carbon bleaches quickly. But at higher altitudes the air is drier and colder. When smoke particles get up to these heights, they can become highly viscous and the bleaching process can be so slow that it practically does not happen.
Atmospheric modelling
The result is significantly different when we put this new, longer-lasting brown carbon into an atmospheric model that simulates the transport of aerosols around the planet and how they interact with solar radiation. The new results show a warming effect on the climate from brown carbon .
This represents another important piece of the climate puzzle.
The Stockholm Resilience Centre’s identifies the processes that regulate the stability and resilience of the Earth system. Aerosols are classified as one of the nine key ways that humans change the environment, but the total risk they pose remains unquantified within the Planetary Boundaries framework.
Research on aerosols can bring us closer to understanding their total effect on the environment, which will make us more prepared and better equipped to deal with the future of our planet.
Allan Bertram receives funding from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada.
Nealan Gerrebos does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.
